Comprehensive Guide to Primes in Base 6 (Senary, Sextal, Heximal, etc.)

Base-6 and Charles Sander Peirce’s Semiotics

“Beyond the considerations already adduced, the chief advantages of one base of numeration over another consist in the simplicity with which it expresses multiples, powers, and especially reciprocals of powers of the prime numbers that in human affairs naturally occur most frequently as divisors” (Charles Sanders Peirce)

Had six taken the place in numeration that ten has actually taken division by 3 would have been performed as easily as divisions by 5 now are, that is by doubling the number and showing the decimal point one place to the right. […] so that there would have been a marked superiority of convenience in this respect in a sextal over a decimal system of arithmetic.” (Charles Sanders Peirce)

Moreover, the multiplication table would have been only about one third as hard to learn as it is, since in place of containing 13 easy products (those of which 2 and 5 are factors) and 15 harder products (where only 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 are factors), it would have contained but 7 easy products, and only 3 hard ones (namely, 4 x 4 = 24, 4 x 5 = 32, and 5 x 5 = 41)” (Charles Sanders Peirce)

In addition to this, [Peirce] remarks that in a Base-6 system, all prime numbers except for 2 and 3 will end in either 1 or 5, making it easy to calculate the remainders after division.

See: Peirce’s Philosophy of Notations and the Trade-offs in Comparing Numeral Symbol Systems


Introduction

The senary (base-6) numeral system provides a structured framework for studying prime numbers. Rooted in modular arithmetic and inspired by Charles Peirce’s semiotic principles, senary simplifies the visualization of primes and offers computational insights. This guide explores these connections, integrating advanced filtering criteria based on 6k±1 combinations.


1. Foundations of the Senary System

1.1 What is Base-6 (Senary)?

Numbers in base-6 are written using six digits: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Each position represents a power of 6:

  • The rightmost digit represents 6^0 (units).
  • The next digit represents 6^1 (sixes).
  • The next represents 6^2 (thirty-sixes), and so on.

Example:
The decimal number 41 is written as 105 in senary:
41 = 1 × 36 + 0 × 6 + 5 × 1.

1.2 Modular Arithmetic and Primes

Prime numbers greater than 3 follow predictable patterns in mod 6 arithmetic:

  • (1 mod 6 or -5 mod 6) = 6k+1: Primes such as 7, 13, 19.
  • (-1 mod 6 or 5 mod 6) = 6k−1: Primes such as 5, 11, 17.

These residues map directly to senary numbers ending in 1 and 5, making base-6 a natural framework for exploring primes.


2. Advanced Filtering: Excluding Composite Products

2.1 Composite Patterns in 6k±1

Not all numbers of the form 6k+1 or 6k−1 are prime. Many are products of numbers in these forms:

  1. (6a−1)(6b−1): Yields 6k+1 number (e.g., 5×11=55).
  2. (6a−1)(6b+1): Yields a 6k−1 number (e.g., 5×7=35).
  3. (6a+1)(6b+1): Yields a 6k+1 number (e.g., 7×13=91).

So, {6k-1} – {(6a−1)(6b+1)} = {set of primes in 6k-1};

and {6k+1} – ({(6a−1)(6b−1)}+{(6a+1)(6b+1)}) = {set of primes in 6k+1}.

2.2 Filtering Example in Senary

  • Example 1: 55(base 10)=131(base 6)​ (ends in 1). Appears as candidate for prime but is 5×11, so it’s composite.
  • Example 2: 35(base 10)=55(base 6) (ends in 5). Appears as candidate for prime but is 5×7, so it’s composite.

While senary endings 1 and 5 indicate candidate primes, further checks (e.g., factoring) are needed.


3. Computational Advantages of Base-6

3.1 Efficient Filtering

Senary digits simplify the exclusion of non-prime candidates:

  • Numbers ending in 0: Divisible by 6.
  • Numbers ending in 2 or 4: Divisible by 2.
  • Numbers ending in 3: Divisible by 3.

3.2 Enhanced Sieving Algorithms

The Sieve of Eratosthenes can be optimized for senary:

  • Focus on numbers ending in 1 or 5 while avoiding residues 0, 2, 3, 4.
  • Exclude composite products (6a±1)(6b±1).

This reduces the computational search space significantly.

3.3 Simplified Multiplication Table

Senary arithmetic simplifies patterns. Example multiplication table (partial):

  ×           1             2             3             4             5 

  ———————–

  1           1              2             3            4              5 

  2           2             4             10           12           14 

  3           3             10           13           20           23 

  4           4             12           20           24           32 

  5           5             14           23           32           41 

Compact representations simplify both computation and visualization.


4. Semiotic and Historical Context

4.1 Peirce’s Semiotics

Charles Peirce highlighted key principles for notation:

  • Iconicity: Senary endings 1 and 5 naturally align with prime residues 6k±1.
  • Simplicity: Fewer digits streamline arithmetic and prime identification.
  • Analytic Depth: Senary supports detailed exploration of prime behavior.

4.2 Historical Context

Base-6 systems have historical significance:

  • Babylonian base-60 influenced modern timekeeping (60 seconds/minutes).
  • Indigenous counting systems often feature base-6 due to its divisibility properties.

5. Challenges and Considerations

5.1 Length of Representations

Senary numbers are longer than decimal equivalents (e.g., 1000(base 10)=4344(base 6)).
However, computational efficiencies may outweigh this drawback.

5.2 Adoption Complexity

Transitioning to senary in binary or decimal-based systems would require significant effort. Conversion overhead may offset some computational gains.


6. Applications and Speculations

6.1 Prime Distribution Analysis

Senary’s cyclic structure can help visualize:

  • Patterns in prime gaps and clusters.
  • Composite exclusions via modular residues.

6.2 Algorithmic Advances

Senary-based algorithms could optimize:

  • Modular sieves for 6k±1 residues.
  • Compact storage of primes in specialized systems.

In current environments, conversion costs might limit such advantages.


Conclusion

Base-6 provides an elegant framework for prime exploration. By integrating modular arithmetic, filtering techniques, and Peirce’s semiotic principles, senary simplifies computation and reveals deeper patterns. This approach holds theoretical and computational promise for mathematicians and theorists alike.

Perpendicularity in Eastern and Western Concepts of the Antichrist Ideomyth

Prompt: Look for perpendiularity in how the concept of the ideomyth of antichrist is used in Russia by comparison to the manifestation of the satanic paradigm in the West as a disinformation model.

Perpendicularity of the Antichrist Ideomyth: Russia vs. the West

Objective: Analyze the concept of the Antichrist ideomyth in Russia and the West, identifying potential perpendicularity between the encoded message and strategic intent within each context.

Russia:

  • Encoded Message: Russia as the defender of true Christian values and the Orthodox faith, standing in opposition to the decadent and “satanic” West, which embodies the Antichrist.
  • Strategic Intent:
    • Justifying Aggression: The Antichrist narrative serves to demonize the West and justify Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and other perceived enemies.
    • Promoting National Unity: It fosters a sense of national unity and purpose, rallying the Russian people around a common enemy and solidifying support for the government.
    • Legitimizing Power: Portraying Russia as a divinely chosen nation with a messianic mission reinforces the legitimacy of the ruling elite and their policies.

Perpendicularity: The encoded message of defending Christian values operates perpendicular to the strategic intent of justifying aggression and consolidating power. This creates a misleading framework where actions that contradict Christian principles, such as war and violence, are portrayed as necessary to combat evil and defend the faith.

Read more: Perpendicularity in Eastern and Western Concepts of the Antichrist Ideomyth

The West:

  • Encoded Message: Promotion of secularism, liberalism, and individual rights, often framed as progressive values and a rejection of religious extremism or fundamentalism.
  • Strategic Intent:
    • Countering Russian Propaganda: The West utilizes this narrative to counter Russian propaganda that portrays it as “satanic” or morally corrupt.
    • Promoting Democratic Values: Advocating for secularism, liberalism, and individual rights aligns with Western democratic principles and serves to distinguish Western societies from authoritarian regimes.
    • Building International Alliances: This narrative helps to attract allies and partners who share similar values and concerns about Russian aggression and influence.

Perpendicularity: The encoded message of promoting progressive values may operate perpendicular to the strategic intent of maintaining geopolitical power and influence. While advocating for individual rights and democracy aligns with Western ideals, it can also be used to justify interventions in other countries or the support of regimes with questionable human rights records, under the guise of promoting democracy or combating threats.

Semiotic Squares:

Russia:

Encoded MessageOpposite
DisinformationDefender of Christian values / Opposing the AntichristEmbracing “satanic” values / Supporting evil
OppositeRejecting Christian values / Aligning with the AntichristUpholding Christian values / Combating evil

Analysis: The semiotic square highlights the hypocrisy within the Russian narrative. While claiming to defend Christian values, Russia’s actions often contradict these principles. This suggests that the true intent lies in the opposite direction, aligning with the characteristics typically associated with the Antichrist.

The West:

Encoded MessageOpposite
DisinformationPromoting progressive values and democracySupporting authoritarianism and oppression
OppositeRejecting progressive values / Supporting tyrannyUpholding progressive values / Promoting freedom

Analysis: The semiotic square reveals the potential for contradiction within the Western narrative. While advocating for progressive values, the West may engage in actions that contradict these principles, such as supporting authoritarian regimes or engaging in military interventions. This suggests a potential hidden agenda or a disconnect between stated values and actual practices.

Conclusion:

The concept of the Antichrist ideomyth and its application in both Russia and the West illustrate the complexity of information warfare and the manipulation of narratives for strategic purposes. By analyzing the perpendicularity between encoded messages and potential strategic intents, we can reveal the contradictions and hidden agendas behind these narratives and better understand the motivations and objectives of the actors involved.

It’s important to note that both Russia and the West engage in information warfare and utilize narratives for strategic purposes. Recognizing the potential for manipulation and critically evaluating information is crucial for discerning truth from falsehood and making informed decisions in the face of complex geopolitical challenges.

Putin’s Doubles: Semiotics of Imposture and Antichrist

Introduction: Game of Clones

Over the past five centuries, there are repeated instances in Russian history where the idea of a “royal impostor” and “pretender” who is an “usurper” to the throne has surfaced in a popular cultural narrative. In his seminal article on the subject of samozvanchestvo, renowned semiotician Boris Uspensky surmised: “[t]o write the history of Russia and avoid the question of royal imposture is impossible.” [1]

As also revealed in Uspensky’s essay; due to their sacralization as a divine ruler, the Russian leader was sometimes simultaneously associated with the antichrist, or in other analogies to the devil himself, who is the original “impostor” and deceiver in Christian tradition.

This essay will examine the resurgence in conspiracy theories suggesting “Putin’s doubles” or that “Putin was replaced” from the historical semiotic perspective of imposture. It attempts to suggest how these recurrent narratives may be organically emergent through the Russian state’s efforts to sacralize Vladimir Putin as an “Orthodox Christian” leader, as well as efforts to shape a politics of memory around “neo-medieval” themes.

AI-generated artwork prompt: ‘ Putin antichrist clone factory ‘ (1:  “Biochip computer clone birthing device”)

Continue reading “Putin’s Doubles: Semiotics of Imposture and Antichrist”