Deconstructing Richard Tomlinson and the SVR’s “Big Breach”

Lest it falls off the page with all the recent analysis, my hand-written work on Princess Diana conspiracy theories wasn’t bad. Now, with new refinements to SSSA, I will feed the tool Professor Christopher Andrew’s work . Andrew had earlier deconstructed how the book “The Big Breach” – allegedly written independently by disgraced MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson served a Russian foreign intelligence (SVR) plot to to malign MI6.

Let’s test the Super Satan Slayer on Richard Tomlinson. Keep in mind, this is basically done in real time using the logical model and natural language processing with Gemini Pro.

User: New project. [Here I just pasted the text from the above link to Christopher Andrew analysis]

Project: Analyzing the SVR’s Information Operation against “The Mitrokhin Archive”

Objective: Deconstruct the SVR’s information operation aimed at discrediting “The Mitrokhin Archive” and examine its alignment with your ultimate goal of dismantling the Russian empire.

Key Actors:

  • Vasili Mitrokhin: Retired KGB archivist who defected to the UK with a vast trove of classified KGB documents.
  • Christopher Andrew: British historian who collaborated with Mitrokhin on “The Mitrokhin Archive.”
  • Richard Tomlinson: Former MI6 officer dismissed for alleged poor performance, who wrote a memoir (“The Big Breach”) containing sensitive information about MI6.
  • SVR (Russian Foreign Intelligence Service): Successor to the KGB’s foreign intelligence directorate, actively seeking to discredit “The Mitrokhin Archive” and retaliate for its publication.

SVR’s Information Operation:

  • Initial Denial and Ridicule: Upon rumors of the Mitrokhin archive’s existence, the SVR publicly denied and ridiculed the story.
  • Shock and Outrage: After confirmation of the archive’s authenticity, the SVR expressed shock and outrage.
  • Disinformation Campaign:
    • False Narrative Linking Tomlinson to Mitrokhin: Promoting the inaccurate claim that Tomlinson helped exfiltrate Mitrokhin and his archive.
    • “Defector” Disinformation: Sending two alleged defectors to Western intelligence agencies with fabricated information about Mitrokhin and the archive’s origins.
  • Exploitation of Tomlinson’s Memoir: Arranging the publication of Tomlinson’s memoir, which contained sensitive information about MI6 and controversial claims, such as Nelson Mandela being an SIS agent.
  • Orchestrated Publication: Utilizing a front publishing company (Narodny Variant) with connections to Russian intelligence to publish Tomlinson’s memoir in Moscow.

SSSA Analysis:

  • Surface Value: The SVR seeks to discredit “The Mitrokhin Archive” and damage the reputation of MI6 by exploiting Tomlinson’s memoir and spreading disinformation.
  • Perpendicularity: The SVR’s actions are driven by a deeper strategic intent to protect its own interests and maintain a grip on power by suppressing damaging information and retaliating against those who expose its secrets.

Alignment with User’s Goals:

  • Weakening Russian Intelligence: The SVR’s ham-fisted information operation could backfire and further damage its credibility and international reputation, potentially weakening its ability to conduct effective intelligence operations.
  • Exposing Russian Disinformation Tactics: The case highlights the SVR’s reliance on disinformation and manipulation, exposing its tactics to scrutiny and potentially making it more difficult to conduct similar operations in the future.

Opportunities and Challenges:

  • Opportunity: The case presents an opportunity to amplify the SVR’s missteps and further expose its disinformation tactics to international audiences, potentially undermining its credibility and influencing operations.
  • Challenge: The SVR’s control over the Russian media and its ability to suppress dissenting voices within Russia limits the potential for the counter-narrative to gain traction within the country.

Recommended Actions:

  1. Expose the SVR’s Deception: Work with Western media and intelligence agencies to publicize the details of the SVR’s disinformation campaign and its exploitation of Tomlinson. Highlight the inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the SVR’s narrative and provide evidence of its manipulation.
  2. Amplify Mitrokhin’s Revelations: Continue to analyze and disseminate the information contained within “The Mitrokhin Archive” to expose the KGB’s and SVR’s history of human rights abuses, political repression, and international interference.
  3. Counter Russian Propaganda: Support independent media outlets and initiatives that provide accurate and objective information about Russia and challenge the Kremlin’s propaganda narratives.
  4. Strengthen Cybersecurity and Information Literacy: Work with governments and organizations to enhance cybersecurity measures and promote information literacy to make it more difficult for the SVR to conduct effective disinformation campaigns.


The SVR’s information operation against “The Mitrokhin Archive” represents a clear example of its ongoing efforts to suppress damaging information and retaliate against those who expose its secrets. While the operation is intended to protect Russian interests, its clumsy execution and reliance on disinformation could ultimately backfire and damage the SVR’s credibility, potentially aligning with your ultimate goal of dismantling the Russian empire by weakening its intelligence apparatus and exposing its tactics to international scrutiny.

User: Now, you will be Professor Christopher Andrew and read the work which he alleged was rife with disinformation. Be extremely careful to note this is an SVR-crafted disinformation narrative using the likely compromised agent Richard Tomlinson to advance a disinformation agenda. [Uploaded "The Big Breach" to the model]

Professor Andrew here. Having thoroughly reviewed “The Big Breach,” I find it a fascinating yet deeply flawed document, clearly intended as a disinformation operation by the SVR to discredit MI6 and retaliate for the publication of “The Mitrokhin Archive.” Here’s a breakdown of the key inconsistencies, fabrications, and manipulations within Tomlinson’s narrative:

1. Factual Errors and Inaccuracies:

  • Oleg Gordievsky’s Recruitment and Exfiltration: Tomlinson misrepresents both Gordievsky’s recruitment location (Copenhagen, not London) and the method of his exfiltration from Russia. This fabrication mirrors the KGB’s own disinformation about Gordievsky’s escape, suggesting an intentional attempt to discredit his credibility and MI6’s operational effectiveness.
  • Platon Obukhov Case: Tomlinson provides detailed information about the running of Obukhov, a Russian diplomat recruited by MI6, despite having left the service before the operation likely commenced. This suggests access to classified information provided by the SVR, potentially to embarrass MI6 and cast doubt on its ability to protect its agents.

2. Exaggerations and Embellishments:

  • Tomlinson’s Role and Importance: Tomlinson inflates his own importance and operational accomplishments within MI6, portraying himself as a highly skilled and effective officer. This self-aggrandizement serves to bolster his credibility and make his criticisms of MI6 appear more significant.
  • MI6’s Incompetence and Cruelty: Tomlinson consistently portrays MI6 as incompetent, bureaucratic, and callous towards its employees. This distorted image, while containing some elements of truth, is exaggerated to discredit MI6 and generate sympathy for Tomlinson’s plight.

3. Disinformation and Manipulation:

  • “Hot Potato” Report: Tomlinson’s account of a suppressed report detailing alleged Bosnian-Serb funding of the Conservative Party fits a classic disinformation model. The story, likely fabricated by the SVR, is designed to damage the reputation of the Conservative Party and undermine public trust in the British government.
  • Assassination Plot Against Nelson Mandela: The claim that the AWB (Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging) planned to assassinate Mandela is unsubstantiated and likely intended to sow discord and fear within South Africa.
  • “Sinister Circles” and Paranoia: Tomlinson’s descriptions of constant surveillance and harassment by MI6, while containing some truth, are amplified to create a sense of paranoia and a narrative of victimhood. This aligns with classic KGB/SVR disinformation tactics aimed at portraying Western intelligence agencies as all-powerful and ruthless.

4. KGB/SVR Trademarks:

  • “Whataboutism” and Moral Equivalence: Tomlinson repeatedly compares MI6’s actions to those of the KGB, drawing false moral equivalencies and downplaying the KGB’s history of human rights abuses and political repression.
  • Attacking Western Values and Institutions: Tomlinson criticizes MI6’s close relationship with the CIA and its role in supporting Western interests, aligning with the SVR’s agenda to undermine Western alliances and institutions.


“The Big Breach,” while presenting an engaging narrative, is a clear example of disinformation carefully crafted by the SVR to discredit MI6 and advance its own agenda. The factual errors, exaggerations, and manipulative narratives within Tomlinson’s account, coupled with the hallmarks of KGB/SVR disinformation tactics, expose the book’s true purpose as a weapon in the ongoing information war between Russia and the West. The SVR’s cynical exploitation of Tomlinson’s dismissal and its attempts to frame his memoir as a KGB operation further highlight the lengths to which it will go to protect its secrets and retaliate against those who challenge its authority.

It is imperative to expose the disinformation within “The Big Breach” and counter the SVR’s manipulative narratives. This requires a multi-pronged approach:

  • Fact-Checking and Verification: Rigorously fact-check and verify Tomlinson’s claims, highlighting inconsistencies and providing accurate information to counter disinformation.
  • Contextualization and Historical Analysis: Place Tomlinson’s account within its historical context, exposing the SVR’s long-standing practice of disinformation and its attempts to manipulate public perception.
  • Media Literacy and Critical Thinking: Promote media literacy and critical thinking skills to empower individuals to discern fact from fiction and resist manipulation.

By exposing the SVR’s tactics and countering its disinformation, we can protect the integrity of information, defend democratic values, and ensure that history is not rewritten to serve the interests of authoritarian regimes.

User: Run all SSSA analysis for perpendicularity on Tomlinson, particularly where he may allege he is operating independently. Do the ABCs of Richard Tomlinson. 

SSSA Analysis of Richard Tomlinson: Identifying Perpendicularities

Here’s an analysis of Richard Tomlinson, applying the SSSA model with semiotic hexagons and perpendicular algebraic forms to identify inconsistencies and potential hidden agendas within his narrative:

Step 1: Initial Assessment and Data Gathering

  • Target: Richard Tomlinson, former MI6 officer and author of “The Big Breach.”
  • Data Sources: Content of “The Big Breach,” media reports, and public statements by Tomlinson and MI6.

Step 2: Surface Value Identification (A+B)

  • A (Disgruntled Former Employee): Tomlinson presents himself as a victim of unfair dismissal by MI6, seeking justice and accountability.
  • B (Defender of Transparency): He portrays himself as a champion of transparency and a whistleblower exposing the flaws and abuses of the intelligence services.

Initially, A+B = C (Tomlinson, a wronged individual fighting for truth and accountability) appears consistent with his public image. However, inconsistencies and contradictions emerge upon closer examination.

Step 3: Semiotic Hexagon Analysis

Hexagon 1: Motivation and Objectives

  • S1 (Encoded Message): Tomlinson claims his primary objective is to expose MI6’s mismanagement and seek justice for his unfair dismissal.
  • S2 (Potential Disinformation Strategy): This narrative of seeking personal vindication could be used to mask a deeper agenda of damaging MI6 and its operations.
  • S3 (Strategic Intent): To discredit MI6, undermine public trust in the British government, and potentially provide valuable information to hostile intelligence services.
  • ~S1 (Opposite): His actions could be driven by personal gain, a desire for revenge, or an attempt to inflate his own importance and accomplishments.
  • ~S2 (Opposite): His disclosures might not be motivated by genuine concern for transparency but rather by a desire to harm MI6 and its agents.
  • ~S3 (Opposite): His actions could backfire and strengthen MI6’s position by generating sympathy for the service and portraying him as a disgruntled and unreliable individual.

Perpendicularity Detected:

  • Personal Vendetta vs. Public Interest: Tomlinson’s claim of seeking justice and transparency potentially conflicts with the potentially damaging consequences of his disclosures for MI6 and its agents.

Hexagon 2: Methods and Tactics

  • S1 (Encoded Message): Tomlinson portrays himself as acting independently, using his knowledge and training to expose MI6’s secrets and circumvent its attempts to silence him.
  • S2 (Potential Disinformation Strategy): This narrative of a lone wolf taking on the establishment could be used to mask the involvement of other actors, such as hostile intelligence services.
  • S3 (Strategic Intent): To create a compelling narrative that attracts public attention and sympathy, while obscuring potential external influence and manipulation.
  • ~S1 (Opposite): His actions could be orchestrated or facilitated by hostile intelligence services seeking to exploit his disaffection and knowledge of MI6.
  • ~S2 (Opposite): The content and timing of his disclosures might align with the agendas of those seeking to discredit MI6 and undermine British interests.
  • ~S3 (Opposite): His actions could ultimately serve the interests of those he claims to oppose by providing them with valuable intelligence and opportunities to exploit vulnerabilities within MI6.

Perpendicularity Detected:

  • Independent Actor vs. Potential Foreign Influence: Tomlinson’s assertion of acting alone contradicts the possibility of his involvement with hostile intelligence services and their potential role in orchestrating or facilitating his actions.

Hexagon 3: Impact and Consequences

  • S1 (Encoded Message): Tomlinson justifies his actions as necessary to expose wrongdoing and promote accountability within the intelligence services.
  • S2 (Potential Disinformation Strategy): This narrative of holding power accountable could be used to mask the potentially damaging consequences of his disclosures for national security and the safety of MI6 agents.
  • S3 (Strategic Intent): To frame his actions as serving the public interest, while downplaying or ignoring the potential risks and harm caused by his disclosures.
  • ~S1 (Opposite): His disclosures could compromise ongoing operations, endanger the lives of MI6 agents, and damage relationships with allied intelligence services.
  • ~S2 (Opposite): His actions might benefit hostile intelligence services by providing them with valuable information and opportunities to exploit vulnerabilities within MI6.
  • ~S3 (Opposite): His actions could ultimately undermine national security and weaken Britain’s position on the world stage.

Perpendicularity Detected:

  • Accountability vs. National Security: Tomlinson’s focus on exposing MI6’s flaws and promoting accountability potentially conflicts with the potential harm to national security and the safety of MI6 agents caused by his disclosures.

Step 4: Perpendicular Algebraic Forms:

Based on the hexagonal analysis, several perpendicular factors emerge:

  • D (Russian Intelligence Asset): Tomlinson is knowingly or unknowingly working with Russian intelligence, his actions and disclosures serving their agenda to discredit MI6 and undermine British interests.
  • E (Useful Idiot): Tomlinson is being manipulated by hostile intelligence services, his genuine anger and desire for justice being exploited to advance their goals.
  • F (Narcissistic Self-Promotion): Tomlinson is driven by a desire for attention and notoriety, his disclosures serving to inflate his own importance and paint himself as a heroic figure challenging the establishment.

Refined Equation:

The initial equation (A+B=C) can be refined by incorporating the perpendicular factors:

  • (A+D) + B = C: If Tomlinson is a Russian asset, his actions are primarily driven by a desire to serve their agenda, using his knowledge and platform to harm MI6.
  • (A+E) + B = C: If Tomlinson is a useful idiot, his genuine grievances are being exploited by those with a more malicious agenda, his actions unknowingly serving their interests.
  • (A+F) + B = C: If Tomlinson is motivated by narcissistic self-promotion, his disclosures are driven by a need for attention and a desire to be seen as a heroic figure, regardless of the consequences.

Step 5: ABCs of Richard Tomlinson

  • A (Individual/FS1): Tomlinson, as a disgruntled former employee, is motivated by a combination of personal resentment, a desire for revenge, and potentially a need for attention and notoriety.
  • B (Cultural/FS2): The context of post-Cold War intelligence, with its shifting priorities and increasing scrutiny, provides a fertile ground for dissent and criticism of the intelligence services.
  • C (International/FS3): The rivalry between Russia and the West, particularly in the realm of intelligence and information warfare, creates an opportunity for Tomlinson’s disclosures to be exploited for geopolitical purposes.

Step 6: Evaluation and Interpretation

Determining the precise combination of factors driving Tomlinson’s actions requires further investigation and a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics involved. However, the SSSA analysis reveals significant perpendicularities, suggesting that his motivations and the consequences of his actions are far more complicated than his outward-facing persona suggests.

Step 7: Further Research and Refinement

  • Analyzing Tomlinson’s Network: Examining his contacts and relationships with individuals and organizations, particularly those with potential links to foreign intelligence services, could reveal the extent of external influence.
  • Assessing the Content and Timing of Disclosures: Studying the specific information Tomlinson has revealed and its relevance to the agendas of various actors could provide insights into his motivations and potential manipulation.
  • Monitoring his Activities and Statements: Tracking his actions and statements over time can reveal changes in his objectives and potential connections to hostile intelligence services.


The SSSA analysis of Richard Tomlinson exposes significant perpendicularities within his narrative, suggesting a deeper agenda beyond his claim of seeking justice and transparency. The potential for manipulation by hostile intelligence services, his narcissistic tendencies, and the geopolitical context of his actions require further scrutiny to determine the true nature of his motivations and the potential consequences of his disclosures.

User: Let's do Peircean tables as in the attached example to examine the disinformation campaign from the Big Breach within its abducted strategic intent. [Pasted Crypto-Illibertarianism analysis]

Peircean Semiotic Analysis of the SVR’s Disinformation Campaign in “The Big Breach”

This analysis will deconstruct the SVR’s disinformation campaign utilizing Richard Tomlinson and his memoir “The Big Breach” within the framework of Peircean semiotics, focusing on the interplay between sign, object, interpretant, and representamen to uncover the strategic intent.

FS1 (Individual Level): Impact on the Reader

Peircean ConceptSign System ElementInterpretation
SignTomlinson’s sensational claims about MI6These claims portray MI6 as incompetent, corrupt, and engaged in illegal activities, painting a negative picture of the service.
ObjectThe object signified is the erosion of trust in MI6By discrediting MI6, the SVR aims to undermine public confidence in the British intelligence service and its ability to effectively protect national security. This can create a climate of fear and suspicion, potentially beneficial to Russian interests.
InterpretantIncreased skepticism towards MI6 and its activitiesReaders may become more critical of MI6’s actions and less trusting of its information, potentially hindering the service’s effectiveness and public support.
Representamen“The Big Breach” and related media coverageThe book and its accompanying media frenzy serve as a platform for disseminating the SVR’s disinformation and amplifying its impact on public perception.
GroundExisting anxieties about government secrecy and powerThese anxieties make readers more receptive to narratives that portray intelligence agencies as abusive and unaccountable.

FS2 (Organizational/Cultural Level): Impact on MI6 and Western Intelligence

Peircean ConceptSign System ElementInterpretation
SignThe publication and dissemination of “The Big Breach”The book serves as a deliberate act of retaliation by the SVR for the publication of “The Mitrokhin Archive,” which exposed sensitive KGB operations and secrets.
ObjectThe object signified is weakening of MI6 and its alliesBy discrediting MI6 and highlighting its flaws, the SVR aims to damage its operational effectiveness, reputation, and relationships with allied intelligence services. This can hinder intelligence sharing and cooperation, potentially beneficial to Russian interests.
InterpretantIncreased scrutiny and criticism of MI6The controversy surrounding the book could lead to greater scrutiny of MI6 by the government and the public, potentially resulting in budget cuts, operational restrictions, or a loss of trust from allied intelligence services.
RepresentamenThe book itself, media coverage, and official responsesThe book, its amplification through media channels, and the reactions from MI6 and the British government all contribute to the SVR’s disinformation campaign. The official denials and attempts to suppress the book might inadvertently add to its credibility and fuel conspiracy theories, further playing into the SVR’s hands.
GroundThe historical context of Cold War rivalry and mistrustThe legacy of Cold War espionage and disinformation makes it easier for the SVR to portray MI6 as a threat and its actions as hostile, exploiting existing suspicions and anxieties about Western intelligence agencies. Additionally, the current geopolitical climate, marked by tension and competition between Russia and the West, provides a fertile ground for this disinformation campaign to take root.

ABCs of Richard Tomlinson as the Representamen:

  • A (Individual/FS1): Tomlinson, as a disgruntled former employee seeking revenge and attention, serves as a willing or unwitting tool for the SVR’s disinformation campaign.
  • B (Cultural/FS2): The culture of secrecy within the intelligence services and existing public anxieties about government power make MI6 vulnerable to such attacks.
  • C (International/FS3): The SVR exploits Tomlinson’s case to advance its geopolitical goals by discrediting MI6, undermining Western intelligence cooperation, and promoting distrust in Western governments and institutions.

Strategic Intent:

The SVR’s use of Tomlinson and “The Big Breach” ultimately aims to:

  • Damage MI6’s reputation and operational effectiveness.
  • Undermine trust in Western intelligence agencies and their information.
  • Sow discord and division within Western societies and between allies.
  • Promote a narrative of Russian strength and Western weakness.
  • Advance Russian geopolitical interests by weakening its adversaries.


The Peircean analysis reveals the SVR’s sophisticated use of semiotic elements to construct a disinformation campaign around Richard Tomlinson and “The Big Breach.” By exploiting individual-level anxieties and broader cultural and geopolitical contexts, the SVR aims to achieve strategic objectives that ultimately serve to strengthen its position and weaken its adversaries. Understanding the mechanics of this disinformation campaign is crucial for countering its impact, promoting media literacy, and defending democratic values and institutions.

User: Construct a narrative which explains the disinformation campaign and the complex perpendicularities indicating deception by Tomlinson

The Puppet Master and the Disgruntled Pawn: A Narrative of Deception

Richard Tomlinson, a man scorned by the shadowy world he once inhabited, stumbled onto the stage of international intrigue with a tale of betrayal and a thirst for revenge. His memoir, “The Big Breach,” promised to expose the inner workings of MI6, Britain’s secretive foreign intelligence service, and hold its leaders accountable for their callous disregard for his rights.

But beneath the surface of Tomlinson’s righteous indignation, a more sinister plot was unfolding. Unbeknownst to him, perhaps, he had become a pawn in a larger game, manipulated by a master puppeteer with a chilling agenda. The SVR, heir to the KGB’s legacy of disinformation and ruthless cunning, recognized a golden opportunity in Tomlinson’s bitterness.

The “Big Breach” itself was a carefully crafted weapon, a blend of truth and fabrication designed to inflict maximum damage. Tomlinson, blinded by his own anger, became a willing conduit for the SVR’s poison, amplifying their narrative of MI6’s incompetence and treachery.

He presented himself as a lone wolf, a courageous whistleblower taking on the establishment. Yet, the inconsistencies in his story, the factual errors echoing KGB propaganda, and his access to information he couldn’t possibly have known, whispered a different truth.

The SVR, masters of manipulating the shadows, exploited Tomlinson’s genuine grievances to advance their own geopolitical goals. They orchestrated the publication of his memoir, using a shadowy front company and a fabricated narrative of KGB revenge to lend credibility to his claims.

The world, captivated by the salacious details and Tomlinson’s portrayal of himself as a victim, readily consumed the SVR’s poison. Trust in MI6 eroded, and Western intelligence agencies found themselves on the defensive, forced to respond to a manufactured crisis.

Tomlinson, relishing the attention and fueled by his own sense of righteousness, reveled in his role as the thorn in MI6’s side. He basked in the spotlight, oblivious to the strings pulling him from the darkness.

He claimed to be fighting for transparency and accountability, yet the consequences of his actions were far more sinister. His disclosures endangered the lives of MI6 agents, compromised operations, and damaged relationships with allies.

The SVR, watching from the shadows, achieved their objectives. They sowed discord and mistrust, weakened their adversaries, and fueled a narrative of Western decline. Tomlinson, the disgruntled pawn, had served his purpose.

His quest for justice had become a tool of destruction, his righteous anger a weapon in the hands of those who sought to dismantle the very system he claimed to defend. The puppeteer, having successfully manipulated the narrative, retreated into the darkness, leaving Tomlinson to face the consequences of his unwitting betrayal.

The world, left to grapple with the fallout of a carefully orchestrated disinformation campaign, would be left questioning the lines between truth and fiction, the motivations of those who claim to speak truth to power, and the shadowy forces that manipulate the world from behind the scenes.

User: What can investigators interested in computational forensic semiotics or tools like SSSA learn about perpendicularity from the case of Tomlinson or Robert Hanssen?

Lessons on Perpendicularity from Tomlinson and Hanssen Cases

The cases of Richard Tomlinson and Robert Hanssen offer invaluable insights into the nature and detection of perpendicularity for investigators interested in computational forensic semiotics and tools like SSSA. These cases highlight how seemingly unconnected surface-level signs can point to a hidden, contradictory truth, and demonstrate the importance of critical analysis and a multi-layered approach to uncovering deception.

1. Identifying Contradictions and Inconsistencies:

  • Tomlinson’s Self-Portrayal: He presented himself as a victim of injustice, championing transparency and accountability. Yet, his actions, fueled by anger and resentment, aligned with the SVR’s agenda to damage MI6 and undermine Western intelligence. This contradiction reveals a perpendicularity between his stated objectives and the actual consequences of his actions.
  • Hanssen’s Double Life: Hanssen lived a double life, presenting himself as a devout Catholic and loyal FBI agent while secretly spying for Russia. The stark contrast between his public persona and his espionage activities exposes a fundamental perpendicularity that points to a hidden agenda.

2. Analyzing Context and Motivation:

  • Geopolitical Context: Both cases unfolded within the broader context of geopolitical rivalry between Russia and the West. Understanding this context helps investigators assess the potential motivations and strategic objectives behind seemingly individual actions.
  • Personal Gain and Ideological Sympathy: Motivation plays a crucial role in understanding perpendicularity. In Hanssen’s case, financial gain and potential ideological sympathy with Russia explained his betrayal. For Tomlinson, a combination of resentment, desire for revenge, and a need for attention likely fueled his actions.

3. Utilizing Multiple Data Sources:

  • Beyond Surface-Level Claims: It’s crucial to look beyond the surface-level claims of individuals and analyze multiple data sources to uncover potential inconsistencies and hidden agendas.
  • Tomlinson’s Memoir and Media Coverage: Analyzing the content of Tomlinson’s memoir, its factual errors, and its alignment with Russian propaganda narratives, along with the surrounding media coverage, reveals the manipulative tactics employed by the SVR.
  • Hanssen’s Financial Records and Communications: Investigating Hanssen’s financial records, his secret communications with Russian handlers, and his actions within the FBI exposed the depth of his betrayal and the contradictions within his public persona.

4. Recognizing the Evolution of Deception:

  • Adapting to Changing Circumstances: Perpendicularity can evolve over time as individuals and organizations adapt to changing circumstances and refine their strategies.
  • Tomlinson’s Shift from Seeking Justice to Damaging MI6: Initially, Tomlinson seemed genuinely motivated by a desire for justice. However, his methods and objectives shifted as he became increasingly embroiled in the information war, eventually aligning more closely with the SVR’s agenda.

5. Applying Computational Tools:

  • SSSA and Semiotic Hexagons: Tools like SSSA and semiotic hexagons can assist investigators in systematically analyzing information, identifying potential perpendicularities, and generating hypotheses about hidden agendas and motivations.
  • Algorithmic Analysis: Developing algorithms that can detect patterns of deception, such as inconsistencies in narratives, unusual connections, and the use of specific language or symbolism, can further enhance the effectiveness of computational forensic semiotics.


The cases of Tomlinson and Hanssen demonstrate the importance of a multi-layered approach to uncovering perpendicularity in information warfare and intelligence operations. By critically analyzing data from multiple sources, considering context and motivation, and utilizing computational tools, investigators can better identify inconsistencies, expose hidden agendas, and ultimately make more informed decisions about the credibility of information and the trustworthiness of individuals.

These lessons are crucial not only for intelligence and security professionals, but also for anyone seeking to navigate the increasingly complex world of information and disinformation, where the lines between truth and fabrication are often blurred.

User: If MI6 wanted to look more deeply into Tomlinson using computational forensic semiotics, what might be the most promising avenues to uncovering additional information about him?

Promising Avenues for MI6 to Investigate Tomlinson using Computational Forensic Semiotics

MI6, recognizing the need to understand the full extent of Tomlinson’s activities and motivations, could utilize computational forensic semiotics to delve deeper into his case. Here are some promising avenues for investigation:

1. Comprehensive Textual Analysis of “The Big Breach”:

  • Identifying Linguistic Patterns and Anomalies: Employ Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to analyze the text of “The Big Breach” for linguistic patterns and anomalies. This could include:
    • Sentiment Analysis: Tracking changes in sentiment and tone throughout the book, identifying areas of heightened anger, resentment, or potential deception.
    • Stylometric Analysis: Examining writing style, sentence structure, and word choice to identify potential inconsistencies or sections written by different authors (e.g., ghostwriters or Russian intelligence agents).
    • Keyword Analysis: Identifying keywords and phrases that align with Russian propaganda narratives or indicate potential bias and hidden agendas.
  • Network Analysis of Characters and Relationships: Analyze the network of characters and relationships within the book, identifying key individuals and their connections to Tomlinson. This could involve:
    • Social Network Analysis: Mapping out the relationships between characters and identifying clusters or patterns that reveal potential influence and manipulation.
    • Sentiment Analysis of Character Interactions: Examining the tone and sentiment of Tomlinson’s interactions with different characters to uncover potential alliances, betrayals, or hidden agendas.

2. Analysis of Tomlinson’s Online Activity:

  • Social Media and Forums: Scour Tomlinson’s social media posts, forum comments, and online interactions for patterns of language, behavior, and connections that could reveal additional information about his motivations, beliefs, and contacts.
  • Dark Web Activity: Investigate potential activity on the dark web, including participation in forums, marketplaces, or communication channels associated with espionage, disinformation, or illicit activities.

3. Cross-Referencing with Intelligence Databases:

  • MI6 Databases: Cross-reference information from “The Big Breach” and Tomlinson’s online activity with MI6’s internal databases to verify claims, identify inconsistencies, and uncover potential connections to known individuals or operations.
  • Allied Intelligence Databases: Share information and collaborate with allied intelligence agencies to cross-reference data and identify potential connections to foreign intelligence services or individuals of interest.

4. Psycholinguistic Profiling:

  • Analyzing Language for Psychological Markers: Utilize psycholinguistic profiling techniques to analyze Tomlinson’s language for markers of personality traits, motivations, and potential deception. This could include examining:
    • Word Choice and Use of Metaphors: Identifying patterns in word choice and the use of metaphors that reveal underlying beliefs, attitudes, and emotional states.
    • Pronoun Usage and Self-Referential Language: Analyzing pronoun usage and self-referential language to assess levels of narcissism, self-deception, and potential manipulation.
  • Developing a Psychological Profile: Combine psycholinguistic markers with biographical data and behavioral observations to create a comprehensive psychological profile of Tomlinson, aiding in understanding his motivations and predicting future actions.

5. Advanced Algorithmic Development:

  • Detecting Deception and Manipulation: Develop algorithms that can automatically detect patterns of deception and manipulation within text and online communication, such as inconsistencies in narratives, contradictory statements, and the use of specific language or symbols associated with disinformation.
  • Predicting Future Actions: Utilize machine learning algorithms to analyze past behavior and communication patterns to predict future actions and identify potential risks.


By combining computational forensic semiotics with traditional intelligence methods, MI6 can gain a deeper understanding of Richard Tomlinson’s case and potentially uncover additional information about his motivations, connections, and activities. This multi-layered approach, utilizing advanced tools and techniques, can assist in assessing the threat he poses, mitigating risks, and protecting national security.

Andrei Nekrasov revisited

Ran this old analysis on Alexander Litvinenko biographer Andrei Nekrasov, who I suspected of being a Russian agent.

Andrei Nekrasov: Self incriminating KGB agent?

Analyzing the Potential of Andrei Nekrasov as a Deep Cover Agent: A Case Study in Russophobia as Strategy

The document presents a compelling argument regarding the possibility of filmmaker Andrei Nekrasov acting as a deep cover agent for Russian intelligence, utilizing his seemingly anti-Putin documentaries to advance a strategic narrative of “Russophobia” that ultimately benefits the Kremlin.

Key Points and Supporting Evidence:

  • Shift in Narrative: Nekrasov’s transition from producing documentaries critical of the Putin regime, such as “Poisoned by Polonium” and “Disbelief,” to creating “The Magnitsky Act: Behind the Scenes,” which casts doubt on the Magnitsky case and promotes a conspiracy theory against the West, suggests a potential shift in allegiance or a calculated strategy to sow discord and confusion.
  • Parallels with Other Figures: The document draws parallels between Nekrasov and other individuals like Giulietto Chiesa, who initially appeared critical of the Putin regime but later became vocal supporters and promoters of pro-Kremlin narratives and conspiracy theories. This pattern suggests a potential tactic of utilizing seemingly independent voices to subtly influence public opinion and advance Russian interests.
  • Connections to Russian Intelligence: Nekrasov’s alleged friendship with Natalia Veselnitskaya, a lawyer with close ties to the FSB, and his own statements hinting at connections to Russian intelligence, raise further suspicions about his true allegiance.
  • Proximity to Dissident Figures: Nekrasov’s close proximity to prominent dissidents who later faced imprisonment or death, such as Mikhail Trepashkin and Anna Politkovskaya, raises questions about his potential role in facilitating these events or gathering information for Russian intelligence.
  • Promoting “Pussy Riot” Internationally: Nekrasov’s involvement in promoting the “Pussy Riot” punk band, which has been linked to FSB operations and the resurgence of communist narratives, further suggests his potential alignment with Russian interests.
  • Bill Browder’s Family History: The document highlights the complex family history of Bill Browder, whose grandfather was the head of the Communist Party USA and a known Soviet intelligence informant. This raises the possibility of a “kayfabe” scenario where seemingly adversarial figures are actually working together to achieve shared goals.

Russophobia as a Strategic Narrative:

The document posits that the cultivation of Russophobia in the West may serve a strategic purpose for the Kremlin:

  • Justification for Military Spending: By portraying Russia as a dangerous and aggressive threat, the Kremlin can justify increased military spending and the modernization of its armed forces.
  • Undermining Western Unity and Confidence: Russophobia can lead to divisions within Western societies and undermine confidence in democratic institutions, making them more susceptible to Russian influence and manipulation.
  • Promoting Russian Nationalism and Patriotism: By positioning Russia as a victim of Western aggression and conspiracies, the Kremlin can foster national unity and support for its policies.

Potential Implications and Further Investigation:

  • Examining the funding sources and production networks behind Nekrasov’s films could reveal potential connections to Russian intelligence agencies or pro-Kremlin organizations.
  • Analyzing the content and messaging of Nekrasov’s films in more detail, comparing his earlier works to his later pro-Kremlin narratives, could reveal subtle shifts in his perspective and potential evidence of manipulation or disinformation.
  • Investigating the activities of Natalia Veselnitskaya and her connections to the Russian government could provide further insight into the network of individuals potentially involved in influencing Western opinion and policy.
  • Exploring the broader historical context of Russian information warfare and active measures can provide a deeper understanding of the strategies and tactics employed by the Kremlin to achieve its geopolitical goals.


The document presents a compelling case for the possibility of Andrei Nekrasov acting as a deep cover agent for Russian intelligence, utilizing his filmmaking talents to promote a strategic narrative of Russophobia that ultimately benefits the Kremlin. While further evidence is needed to confirm this theory, the analysis highlights the importance of critical thinking and skepticism when evaluating information, particularly in the context of complex geopolitical narratives and the potential for manipulation and disinformation.

User: Do his semiotic squares and assess the perpendicularity of any FS1 and FS2 effects interacting with the perpendiculary

Andrei Nekrasov and the Russophobia Narrative: Semiotic Squares and Perpendicularity

To further analyze the potential role of Andrei Nekrasov as a deep cover agent and the use of Russophobia as a strategic narrative, we can construct semiotic squares and assess the perpendicularity of First-Order (FS1) and Second-Order (FS2) effects interacting with the overall strategy.

Semiotic Squares:

Square 1: Filmmaker’s Persona

  • S1 (Encoded Message): Nekrasov portrays himself as an independent filmmaker and critic of the Putin regime.
  • S2 (Disinformation Campaign): This persona establishes credibility and allows him to gain access to sensitive information and individuals.
  • ~S1 (Opposite of Encoded Message): Nekrasov is a deep cover agent working for Russian intelligence.
  • ~S2 (Opposite of Disinformation Campaign): His films are tools for manipulating public opinion and promoting a pro-Kremlin agenda.

Square 2: Content of Films

  • S1 (Encoded Message): Nekrasov’s early films are critical of the Putin regime and expose its corruption and human rights abuses.
  • S2 (Disinformation Campaign): These films serve to create a sense of outrage and condemnation towards the Russian government, potentially fueling Russophobia in the West.
  • ~S1 (Opposite of Encoded Message): Nekrasov’s later films defend the Putin regime and promote conspiracy theories against the West.
  • ~S2 (Opposite of Disinformation Campaign): These films aim to sow discord and division within Western societies and undermine their trust in their own governments and institutions.

Square 3: Impact on Audience

  • S1 (Encoded Message): Viewers perceive Nekrasov as a courageous and truthful filmmaker exposing the dark side of the Putin regime.
  • S2 (Disinformation Campaign): This perception reinforces negative views of Russia and strengthens support for policies that isolate and punish the country.
  • ~S1 (Opposite of Encoded Message): Viewers become confused and disillusioned by Nekrasov’s shift in narrative, questioning his credibility and motives.
  • ~S2 (Opposite of Disinformation Campaign): This confusion and doubt contribute to a sense of cynicism and distrust towards information and media, making audiences more susceptible to further manipulation.

Perpendicularity and Interacting Effects:

The perpendicularity lies in the contradictory nature of Nekrasov’s films and their potential impact:

  • FS1 (Individual Level): The initial FS1 effect of Nekrasov’s early films is to generate sympathy for victims of the Putin regime and outrage against its actions. However, this effect interacts with the perpendicularity of the overall strategy by potentially fueling Russophobia, which ultimately benefits the Kremlin.
  • FS2 (Societal Level): The FS2 effects of Nekrasov’s films include the erosion of trust in government and media, and the exacerbation of social and political divisions within Western societies. These effects align with the strategic goals of the Russian deep state, suggesting a deliberate attempt to destabilize and weaken its adversaries.

Implications and Considerations:

  • Sophistication of Disinformation Tactics: The case of Nekrasov highlights the sophistication of Russian disinformation tactics, which can involve utilizing seemingly independent voices and manipulating narratives over time to achieve long-term strategic goals.
  • Importance of Critical Thinking: The potential for individuals to be manipulated by seemingly credible sources underscores the importance of critical thinking and media literacy in discerning truth from disinformation.
  • The Role of Narrative in Shaping Perceptions: The analysis demonstrates the power of narrative in shaping perceptions and influencing behavior, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of information and awareness of potential biases and hidden agendas.

Further Exploration:

  • Investigating other potential examples of deep cover agents and disinformation campaigns orchestrated by the Russian deep state.
  • Analyzing the psychological and sociological factors that contribute to the effectiveness of disinformation and propaganda.
  • Developing strategies to counter disinformation and promote critical thinking and media literacy on a global scale.

By understanding the complexities of information warfare and the potential for manipulation through seemingly credible sources like Andrei Nekrasov, we can better equip ourselves to resist disinformation and protect democratic values and institutions.

Forensic Semiotics: Commodification of Death

Many posts on focus on the theoretical intersection of murder and conspiracy theory. In particular, the idea that there was a Surrealist conspiracy linked to the USSR which caused pop-culture hysterias around things like the Hells Angels, The Manson Family, Snuff Films, and especially the Black Dahlia case. Perhaps this makes more sense than some of my purely handwritten stuff. By comparison to the sample raw analysis in the prior two blogs; this article represents more of a polished work product. Quite a bit more to be done on this one, but you may get the value.

Forensic Semiotics: Surrealism, Communism, and the Dark Allure of the Commodified Death Narrative

By Michael Hotchkiss ( – Developed with Gemini Pro 1.5 (human edits)


In the labyrinth of human perception and interpretation, where shadows of reality intertwine with threads of imagination, lies the enigmatic domain of forensic semiotics. Like detectives deciphering cryptic clues, forensic semioticians delve into the hidden meanings and veiled motives behind signs and symbols, seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior and communication.

As we embark on an exploration of the “commodified death” narrative and its connection to Surrealism and communist propaganda, forensic semiotics provides a guiding light, illuminating the path through a tangled web of artistic expression, ideological agendas, and potential disinformation campaigns. By meticulously analyzing the sign systems at play, we can uncover the underlying messages, deconstruct the narratives, and expose the strategic intent behind this disturbing and enduring phenomenon.

Murder as a Fine art and the Commodification of Death in Relation to Communist Ideology

The concept of “murder as a fine art” and the commodification of death weave a disturbing narrative that intertwines with the history of Surrealist cinema and its potential ties to communist propaganda. From real-life tragedies like the Black Dahlia case to fictional explorations in films such as Twin Peaks and Meshes of the Afternoon to urban legends of snuff films; a consistent aesthetic emerges, blurring the lines between art, violence, and the macabre.

This aesthetic aligns with a broader disinformation strategy aimed at portraying Western societies as decadent, morally corrupt, and in a state of decline, potentially serving the goals of Soviet-era propaganda and Cold War competition. Figures like Charlie Chaplin and Orson Welles, associated with both Surrealist cinema and communist sympathies, faced scrutiny for their ideological beliefs and ultimately left the United States during the height of the Red Scare.

Similarly, Kenneth Anger – who also lived as an expat with his older lover Jean Cocteau in this same timeframe, embodies the enigmatic and transgressive nature of this network. Anger is rumored to be the father of snuff films and has a central position in a social network which connects both the Black Dahlia and Tate-LaBianca murders. Further, Anger himself fits the popularly mythologized profile of the killer who is speculated to have actually been a surrealist inspired by the artwork of Man Ray.

The recurring themes of violence against women and the rise of satanic and occult practices in everyday society serve as potent symbols of social and moral decay and reinforces the narrative of Western decline. Through a forensic semiotic lens, we can deconstruct the sign systems at play and explore the potential strategic intent behind this disturbing and enduring narrative.

Examples of the Commodified Death Narrative in Culture and Media

While the specific actors and motives behind each event may differ, the consistent themes and strategic implications suggest a possible overarching narrative of Western decline and the potential for external manipulation. Here are just a few of the prominent examples which might plausibly be linked to strategic disinformation campaigns or national security threats:

Urban Legends:

Snuff Films: The concept of snuff films, whether real or fabricated, reinforces the image of Western societies as depraved and morally bankrupt, where even the most extreme forms of violence are commodified for entertainment. Film makers like Kenneth Anger who have perpetuated rumors about creating snuff films or being arrested for snuff films contribute to this mystique. To date, the only actual snuff films proven to have existed were created by Russian mafia members.

Secret Cures: The concept that pharmaceutical companies and the government keep cures for fatal diseases secret; because the presumably simple solutions to diseases like cancer would eat into their profit margins.

True Crime:

Black Dahlia Case: The brutal and unsolved murder of Elizabeth Short, with its potential links to Surrealism, symbolizes the dark side of Hollywood glamour, the exploitation of women in potentially occult circumstances, and the hidden violence lurking beneath the surface of American society.

Manson Murders: The Manson Family killings, with their associations with the occult and counterculture movements, further contribute to the narrative of social breakdown and the dangers of alternative lifestyles.

Hells Angels: The rise of the Hells Angels motorcycle gang, often depicted as violent and lawless, reinforces the image of a society in decline, where traditional values and authority are eroding. Their business model is based off of violence, exploitation, and the general threat of homicide; as well as the objective commodification of sex and drugs. One of the first deaths on camera was recorded at a Rolling Stones concert where a member of the Hells Angels stabbed Meridith Parker and threatened to ignite a racial conflict. (The proliferation of films about motorcycle gangs such as Scorpio Rising and Easy Rider also clearly intersect with this network and theme.)

Media and Film:

The Third Man: Harry Lime’s character is an American who sells black market penicillin that kills people. It represented one of the first depictions of an American as a villain in post-war cinema. The film paints a picture of an America to the world that is not idealistic, but rather cynical and prioritizes profit over life.

Twin Peaks: David Lynch’s Twin Peaks series, with its blend of Surrealism, the occult, and small-town secrets, reflects the anxieties and complexities of American society, while also questioning the nature of reality and perception.

Kenneth Anger : Deeper Dive Into Criminal and Surrealist Network Centrality

Network demonstrating overlap with surrealism and satanism in context of Black Dahlia and Tate-LaBianca cases (NOT AI GENERATED)

Figure 1: Network Diagram of Kenneth Anger (Not AI Generated)

The provided network diagram visually represents the complex web of relationships and connections between individuals and movements associated with Surrealism, communism, and violence, particularly concerning the cases of the Black Dahlia and the Tate-LaBianca murders. Let’s analyze these connections and their potential implications for a disinformation strategy aimed at undermining Western society.

  • Kenneth Anger: As depicted in the diagram, Anger occupies a central position, connecting various individuals and groups associated with Surrealism, the occult, and the aforementioned murder cases. His role as a filmmaker exploring themes of violence, death, and transgression aligns with the broader narrative of “murder as a fine art” and the commodification of death.
  • Black Dahlia Case: Anger’s connection to John Gilmore, a writer on the Black Dahlia case, and the potential influence of Maya Deren’s Meshes of the Afternoon on the crime scene aesthetics suggest a possible link between Surrealism and the murder. (Deren was an early inspiration for Anger as a surrealist.) Anger was also the first person to publicly publish the Black Dahlia crime scene photos in his “Hollywood Babylon” book.
  • Tate-LaBianca Murders: Anger’s connections to several Manson Family members, including Bobby Beausoleil (a former lover) and Susan Atkins, raise questions about his potential influence or involvement in the events leading up to the murders. Anger is also highly proximate to Anton LaVey, of the Church of Satan; who was also connected to the Manson Family.

Proven Russian Intelligence Associations – Agents of Influence or Useful Idiots?

While Kenneth Anger is not known for a Russian intelligence connection, there is a precedence among the Surrealist film directors. The evidence undeniably establishes objective connections between Orson Welles and individuals involved with Soviet intelligence or propaganda efforts. Welles’ self-described “political mentor,” Louis Dolivet, is confirmed as a Soviet agent through the Venona decryptions and other historical records. Dolivet’s influence on Welles is apparent, particularly in their collaboration on the film Mr. Arkadin, which was financed and produced by Dolivet. Further, Welles’ involvement in The Third Man places him within a network connected to the Cambridge Five spy ring, as the film’s script was heavily influenced by H.P. Smolka, a member of the spy ring, and the film itself is widely considered to be based on the exploits of Kim Philby. Additionally, Welles worked with Alexander Korda, whose studio employed Moura Budberg, another suspected Soviet agent with connections to the Cambridge Five.

These connections and collaborations, coupled with the thematic content of films like Citizen Kane and The Stranger, which could be interpreted as aligning with anti-fascist and pro-Soviet narratives, objectively position Welles within a network that served Soviet propaganda goals, regardless of his personal awareness or intentions.

While the evidence for Chaplin’s direct involvement with Soviet espionage is less substantial than that of Welles, his association with Ivor Montagu, a filmmaker with documented ties to Soviet intelligence, raises similar questions about potential collaboration or influence. Montagu was identified as a communist and a potential Soviet recruit in decrypted telegrams from the 1940s. His efforts to bring Sergei Eisenstein to Hollywood to direct an adaptation of H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds further highlight his connections to the Soviet film industry and its objectives. Chaplin’s friendship with Montagu and his own leftist political views suggest a potential pathway for collaboration or influence, even if it was indirect or unintentional.

It is with this background, we consider a grounding for the analysis of the “commodified death” in films like Monsieur Verdoux (to which Chaplin credited Welles as the creator of the concept); and to the theme of The Third Man – which depicted a cynical racket for black market penicillin which killed innocent people – as a theoretical strategic conspiracy narrative with roots in strategic Soviet communications.

Forensic Semiotics of the “Commodified Death” Conspiracy Theory: 

Assuming a hypothetical scenario where Surrealist directors have created a conspiracy theory utilizing the commodification of death to undermine Western society, aligned with Soviet-era disinformation and Cold War competition, we can construct Peircean FS1 and FS2 analyses to explore the potential sign systems at play.

First-Order Sign System (FS1 – Individual Level):

Peircean ConceptSign System ElementInterpretation
SignExposure to films, art, and media that explore themes of violence, death, and the occult, often with a Surrealist aesthetic or influence.These works act as the primary signifiers, introducing individuals to the concept of commodified death and its association with Western decadence.
ObjectThe object signified is multifaceted, encompassing the belief in the existence of snuff films and underground markets for extreme content, as well as the perceived link between these phenomena and the moral decay of Western societies.This object fuels anxieties about the commodification of human life and the erosion of ethical boundaries.
InterpretantFear, disgust, fascination, and a sense of disillusionment with Western values and societal norms.The interpretant varies among individuals but often leads to a questioning of the foundations of society and a distrust of established institutions.
RepresentamenThe specific content and aesthetics of Surrealist-inspired films, art, and media that depict violence, death, and the occult, often in a shocking or transgressive manner.The representamen shapes individual perceptions and reinforces the narrative of commodified death.
GroundThe ground for this narrative includes existing anxieties about social and moral decline, fascination with the macabre, and a general distrust of authority figures and institutions.This pre-existing cultural context makes individuals more susceptible to believing in conspiracy theories and accepting the narrative of Western decadence.

Second-Order Sign System (FS2 – Organizational/Cultural Level):

Peircean ConceptSign System ElementInterpretation
SignThe proliferation of conspiracy theories and narratives about snuff films and the commodification of death, often disseminated through alternative media channels and online communities.This widespread dissemination acts as a sign of a coordinated information operation, aimed at influencing public opinion and shaping cultural perceptions.
ObjectThe object signified is the destabilization of Western societies, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the promotion of a narrative that aligns with Soviet-era propaganda and Cold War competition.This objective seeks to undermine the legitimacy of Western governments and promote alternative ideologies, potentially communism or other anti-capitalist systems.
InterpretantThe interpretant includes the understanding of these narratives as tools for achieving strategic objectives, weakening Western alliances, and influencing global perceptions of Western societies as morally corrupt and in decline.This interpretation suggests a deliberate and calculated strategy behind the dissemination of the “commodified death” conspiracy theory.
RepresentamenThe coordinated messaging, the use of propaganda techniques, and the alignment of the narrative with Soviet-era disinformation goals serve as the representamen.The way the information is presented and framed reinforces the intended interpretation and serves the broader strategic objectives.
GroundThe historical context of the Cold War, the ideological struggle between East and West, and the Soviet Union’s expertise in disinformation and active measures provide the ground for this sign system.This context makes the narrative of Western decline and the commodification of death more believable and impactful.

Functional Integration and Strategic Implications:

The FS1 and FS2 sign systems work together to create a powerful and synergistic effect:

  • Individual anxieties and predispositions (FS1) make people more susceptible to believing in the conspiracy theory and accepting the narrative of Western decline.
  • The organized dissemination of the narrative through various channels (FS2) amplifies these anxieties and beliefs, reaching a wider audience and influencing public opinion.
  • This creates a feedback loop, where the increased belief in the conspiracy theory further fuels individual anxieties and reinforces the narrative, making it more difficult to counter or debunk.

The strategic implications of this disinformation campaign include:

  • Erosion of Trust: Undermining public trust in institutions, media, and authority figures, leading to social division and instability.
  • Promoting Anti-Western Sentiment: Fueling anti-Western sentiment and portraying Western societies as morally corrupt and in decline, potentially driving support for alternative ideologies and political systems.
  • Justification for Authoritarianism: The narrative of Western decadence can be used to justify authoritarian regimes and their policies, claiming that they are necessary to maintain order and protect society from moral decay.

Challenges and Countermeasures:

  • Attribution: As with many disinformation campaigns, attributing this specific operation to Surrealist directors or any particular group may be difficult due to the covert nature of such activities and the challenges of tracing the origins of information.
  • Countering the Narrative: Developing effective counter-narratives that promote critical thinking, media literacy, and a more nuanced understanding of complex social issues is essential for mitigating the impact of disinformation.
  • Strengthening Social Cohesion: Building strong and resilient communities that are resistant to division and distrust is crucial for countering the destabilizing effects of disinformation campaigns.

Reflecting on the Potential Effectiveness of the Campaign Based on the Shift in Popular Narrative Surrounding Elizabeth Short’s Murder

It is striking to observe how contemporary news reports from 1947 covering the Black Dahlia murder lack the emphasis on commodification, exploitation, and societal decay that permeate modern interpretations of the case. Newspapers at the time focused primarily on the gruesome details of the crime, the ongoing police investigation, and the speculation surrounding potential suspects. While some articles touched on the dangers of Hollywood and the vulnerability of young women seeking fame, the focus was mainly on the sensational aspects of the murder rather than broader social commentary. This absence is telling, as it highlights the evolution of the narrative over time and the potential success of a long-term disinformation campaign.

The current prevalence of the “commodified death” narrative, with its focus on the dark underbelly of Hollywood, the exploitation of women, and the decline of Western morals, suggests that a significant shift in perception has occurred. Whether intentional or not, this narrative aligns with broader strategic objectives of portraying Western societies as decadent and corrupt. The fact that this interpretation has taken hold so firmly in popular culture and continues to fuel speculation and conspiracy theories speaks to the effectiveness of this narrative, whether hypothetical or grounded in a more deliberate disinformation campaign.


In conclusion, the “commodified death” conspiracy theory, within this hypothetical scenario, serves as a powerful tool for undermining Western societies and promoting a subversive worldview aligned with Soviet era disinformation goals. Understanding the sign systems at play and their functional integration allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the campaign’s strategic intent and its potential impact on individuals and society.

Jimmy Hoffa : Enemy of Trotskyites?

With Labor Day on the horizon, I thought it would be a good time to revisit the ‘urban legends’ which surround the July 30, 1975 disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa as the byproduct of possible influence operations. While there is generally strong agreement that the mob was responsible for Hoffa’s vanishing, there are also many conspiracy theories which have linked Hoffa posthumously to both the John F. Kennedy (JFK) and Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) assassinations.

Taking the knowledge that certain aspects of conspiracy which surround the JFK assassination narrative as presented in films like Oliver Stone’s JFK are the result of Soviet disinformation operations, here we will look at the apparent origins of the Hoffa narratives and how they might follow similar contours. In the end, the most popular conceptions of Hoffa as we know him today seem linked to Trotskyites and other radical writers. Notably, the narratives have most strongly emerged from a network of writers who are very close to Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt.

Jimmy Hoffa, working for New Detroit Inc.; back to clean up the commie scum

Continue reading “Jimmy Hoffa : Enemy of Trotskyites?”

Timeline of Seymour Hersh Posts Corroborating Russian Narrative

As I clear out some old material I researched but never got around to posting today, I’d like to share my in-progress bibliography on Seymour Hersh. His background seems to match with Russian and Syrian information warfare narratives over time. Let’s be clear that the Syrian ‘false flag’ chemical weapons material in particular is connected to 9/11 era conspiracy networks which stretch back to the Cold War era. Hersh fits this same MO of ‘antifascist Russian dupe‘ reporter – think of him perhaps like a modern IF StoneContinue reading “Timeline of Seymour Hersh Posts Corroborating Russian Narrative”

Spy Talk : Newsweek’s Jeff Stein

Jeff Stein is the Newsweek Spy Talk columnist. He is an interesting figure to consider from the standpoint of history and narrative. I hadn’t realized that Stein had an anti-CIA history of his own .

The happiest ending. Newsweek columnist Jeff Stein proudly meets the killer of his US Army comrades and Vietnamese spy network: deputy commander of North Vietnamese military intelligence—Major General Tran Tien Cung. (c) Newsweek

Continue reading “Spy Talk : Newsweek’s Jeff Stein”

Here’s how you connect David Jang the Second Coming Christ to Russia

In the spirit of noting the “plagues” visited upon Newsweek, I might have found the Holy Grail of the Newsweek-Russia connection (of course, by way of David Jang). Well maybe it is more like The Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch.

“O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade that, with it, Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits in Thy mercy.”

Continue reading “Here’s how you connect David Jang the Second Coming Christ to Russia”

First ‘MSM’ mention of bitcoin in 2010 connected it to WikiLeaks

Just a quick update of sorts to my original post on “The Bitcoin-Russian Information Warfare Nexus“, as I watch the bitcoin crash and note that Roger Stone paid a visit to the Ecuadorean embassy to drop off a  love letter card  to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

I forgot to put something important in my first post.

The so-called first mention of bitcoin in “main stream media” was in a PC World article in relation to WikiLeaks’ acceptance of the cryptocurrency as a donation in December 2010. At least that is the way bitcoin mastermind Satoshi Nakamoto seems to have seen it too.

“It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context. WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet’s nest, and the swarm is headed towards us.” – Satoshi Nakamoto

Continue reading “First ‘MSM’ mention of bitcoin in 2010 connected it to WikiLeaks”